{"id":9288,"date":"2020-10-26T16:19:42","date_gmt":"2020-10-26T15:19:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ficosterra.com\/ensayos-comparativos-con-el-bioestimulante-ficosagro-confirman-su-eficacia-y-rentabilidad\/"},"modified":"2020-10-29T21:10:56","modified_gmt":"2020-10-29T20:10:56","slug":"ensayos-comparativos-con-el-bioestimulante-ficosagro-confirman-su-eficacia-y-rentabilidad","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ficosterra.com\/en\/ensayos-comparativos-con-el-bioestimulante-ficosagro-confirman-su-eficacia-y-rentabilidad\/","title":{"rendered":"Comparative trials with the biostimulant ficosagro\u00ae confirm its effectiveness and profitability"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
The main objective of this trial was to identify the influence of the biostimulant ficosagro\u00ae<\/a><\/strong> in terms of early harvest and increased production in strawberries, Fortuna variety, and to compare it with ANOTHER biostimulant product made of competitive microorganisms composed of Azospirillum brasilense<\/em><\/strong> -which acts as a nitrogen fixative- and Pantoea dispersa<\/em><\/strong> – which acts as a phosphorus solubilizer-, two species that perform these two functions very well but, as we will see below, do not work directly on the fertilizer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The test, carried out by a technical consulting engineer from Huelva, a specialist in berries, began between October 7 and 10, 2019, and has lasted for almost six months.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A farm in Palos de la Frontera (Huelva) was chosen and divided into two irrigation sectors for better management:<\/p>\n\n\n\n The pH of the land is about 7.5 and its texture is sandy. Irrigation water wavers between Ce 0.25-0.30 DS \/ cm\u00b2. These premises guarantee that neither of the two sectors may be harmed or benefited in terms of productivity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The first conclusion we reached with this trial in strawberry (Fortuna) from Huelva, is that not all biostimulants of microorganisms exert the same influence on crops or have the same repercussions on the farmer’s profit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n ficosagro\u00ae<\/a><\/span><\/strong>, unlike the OTHER product of competitive microorganisms, is a microbial broth with a differential value in its composition, since it combines the regenerative properties of algae and those of microorganisms (tecnolog\u00eda BCB<\/a>), two tools that work in the soil in a complementary way, providing the crop with its maximum productivity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This kick of life<\/em> is perceived above all in the early phase of the crop, when the farmer, in this case, obtains a greater profit from the sale of the fruit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In the summary table that we present below, we see how the application of the biostimulant ficosagro\u00ae<\/a><\/span> has managed to increase the total productivity over the OTHER<\/strong> biostimulant of microorganisms Azospirillum brasilense<\/em> and Pantoea<\/em> dispersed by 3.95% in the entire campaign, 28.1% in the first 10 weeks (early fruit sale phase).<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Therefore, precocity and high productivity are associated with the application of the biostimulant ficosagro\u00ae<\/strong><\/a><\/span>, whose price per liter is, today, significantly lower than that of the OTHER biostimulant product of the competition.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n
Characteristics of the land and fertilization<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Conventional fertilization has been used in the two plots; Crop management techniques as well as phytosanitary techniques have also been the same for the two treated areas.<\/p>\n\n\n\nResults<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
<\/figure><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
<\/figure><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

CONCLUSIONS<\/h2>\n\n\n\n